In an age in which we're seeing our country's constitutional principles being flouted from on high as just so many words that no longer apply because conditions have changed and we're so much more enlightened now than our fathers were (Ha!), and in which we see little, if any, resistance at the lower levels to these impositions on us from those that quite literally have no power that WE do not lend them, temporarily, under the conditions that they use them wisely and properly and honor the conditions of their oaths; when someone comes along saying he will begin advocating for a restoration of the federal principle in an effort to save the country from impending doom, that person is tugging at my heart strings:
Dr. Yeagley wrote:
I'm going to start campaigning for states rights. Maybe we can plug in the US Constitution at that level. Washington is truly hopeless at this point.
Good to have you onboard, Dr. Yeagley! Without a restoration of the federal principle in America, we are truly doomed. While you're at it, please consider joining forces with those of us who advocate for an Article V Convention for proposing amendments.
There is a Constitutional process, little known to most Americans and never yet exercised, for wresting power from the central government back to the states and to the People where it rightly belongs. And it is tailor made for such a time as this. Indeed, times like these is the very reason the founders inserted this little known gem into the Constitution. This process is, as I dubbed it for my own purposes years back when I first discovered it, "The state initiated method" for proposing amendments, which is to say that it only involves Congress and the national authority as acting on the sidelines, so to speak. The People, by merely calling such a convention, assert themselves and their authority over the national government.
It would involve no less than what George Washington described in his Farewell Speech as "a solemn act of the whole People of the United States," simply to initiate, much more to see it through to its end. At this very moment in time we have the required number of states (two thirds) to initiate this method on something like the FMA if we so choose, and probably enough states to meet the requisite number required (three fourths) to ratify such an amendment. But my preference would be to initiate the process under some overarching banner under which would fall such amendment proposals as the FMA, review of the judicial power, and so forth.
In the end what I personally should like to see by this method a propping up of the ninth and tenth amendments; a reassertion of the principle that power emanates from the People, not from the unaccountable and despotic central government.
I've written about it many times, and several times recently, at my blog and elsewhere if you or any of your readers care to check it out.
terry, please flip me an e-mail: john@cc2.com
ReplyDeleteyou need some more information about the convention clause of article v.
http://www.americanthinker.com/2008/10/this_could_be_the_game_changer.html
ReplyDeleteHey Terry,
Have you seen this?
http://www.americanthinker.com/2008
ReplyDelete/10/this_could_be_the_game_
changer.html
One more time on that url.
The court filings are fascinating.
ReplyDeleteMom,
ReplyDeleteIs this the article you're talking about? (I had a hard time getting the url you provided to work.)
Yes, that's the one.
ReplyDeleteYes, that's the one.
ReplyDeleteOkay, thank you.
I read about this question of Obama's natural born citizenship status a while back somewhere else. Let me see whether I can retrace my steps.