...I mean a ... umm, what I mean is a ... a non-real racist? Lawrence Auster subitted a comment at FrontPage Magazine criticizing David Horowitz's vision of America:
Horowitz:White European-American culture is a culture that the citizens of this nation can take enormous pride in, precisely because its principles, revolutionary in their conception and unique in their provenance, provide for the inclusion of cultures that are non-white and non-Christian (and which are not so tolerant in their lands of origin).
Auster:David Horowitz writes:
“White European-American culture is a culture that the citizens of this nation can take enormous pride in, precisely because its principles, revolutionary in their conception and unique in their provenance, provide for the inclusion of cultures that are non-white and non-Christian (and which are not so tolerant in their lands of origin).”
So, according to Horowitz, white European-American culture is good, and the main reason it is good is that it includes non-white and non-Christian cultures. The greatest thing about white European-American culture is that it allows itself to be progressively changed into a melange of nonwhite, non-European, non-Christian cultures and peoples.
Now think about the fact that Horowitz’s vision—assertively pro-America, with the defining thing about America being the fact that it includes ever greater numbers of non-white and non-Western peoples and their cultures—presents itself as the “conservative” vision today, as distinct from the leftist, anti-American vision which Horowitz opposes.
Think of the choice between left and “right” that Horowitz offers us.
On one side, the anti-American left, which openly declares its intention to end white Christian America, by changing America into a nonwhite, non-Christian country.
On the other side, the pro-American “right,” which openly declares its intention to end white Christian America, by changing America into a nonwhite, non-Christian country.
Someone named Jack Hampton instantly smelled a rat, umm, I mean a rar (Real [American] Racist) upon reading Auster's comments:
Jack Hampton:Why do I smell a real racist.
ROTFL!!!
Wednesday, October 14, 2009
How to distinguish a real racist from a ...
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
This is why the argument over who is racist is so pointless. Jack Hampton goes on to (inadvertently) make a pretty good case that racism is a necessary characteristic of any society which wants to be around in the long term.
I don't believe that to be the case, but I certainly do believe that a society which tries to eradicate racism will only succeed in institutionalizing oppression directed towards those groups with the most actual value to that society.
People tend to fall into the idea that whatever government permits is therefore endorsed. That can only be true in totalitarian society. A limited government permits much that it is simply prohibited from forbidding.
It is a mark of how far America has strayed, that almost no one can spontaneously imagine what limited government would suggest.
I'll have to check out Hampton's follow-on comments in that thread.
I did see, this morning, where he confused the Pilgrims' attempt at socialism with the Mayflower Compact. But I didn't think it worthwhile to correct him on it.
Post a Comment